AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Starter AML-CTF Programs

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Starter AML-CTF Programs

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024

“Modernisation & Simplification” (cough).

The AGD has published the government response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee report on the AML/CTF Amendment Bill 2024

Yes, a response to a bill that is already in force. Leaving that aside, the response makes interesting reading.

It’s mostly self-serving, as you’d expect, but there are a few comments worth noting.

In relation to AUSTRAC assiting new reporting entities it states “For example, AUSTRAC will develop ‘Starter Programs’, which will help small businesses establish AML/CTF programs, one of the major obligations under the AML/CTF regime. Small businesses would pick the Starter Program closest to them, and tweak to fit their circumstances. This will streamline regulatory costs and help reduce the cost burden on small businesses.”

Some thoughts on this:

1. On the assumption that AUSTRAC neither has the skills and experience to develop “Starter Programs”, who will? Will a consulancy or law firm be tasked to developed these Programs? Good, if risky work, if it can be landed.
2. How will said “Starter Programs” deal with all the new complexity built into the AML/CTF Amendment Act?
3. Will the Starter Programs have a ML/TF Risk Assessment? Will that ML/TF Risk Assessment deal with non-proliferation financing risk?
4. What will AUSTRAC’s regularly response be when a new (or current) reporting enitity has (I use the term loosely) a Starter Program? Does this give the reporting entity immunity as it is relying on its regular’s docuement? I very much doubt it but that will be the perception in the new industries.
5. What happens at the first Independent evaluation when an Independent Evaluator legitimately suggests that the Starter Progam does not meet the law? And that is before the issue of implementation.

An amusing statement from the government: “The Government has reduced regulatory burden by simplifying and modernising the AML/CTF regime. Tranche two entities will have substantially lower costs ($2.1 billion less) than if they were regulated under the current regime”.

https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=aac35e3a-b557-4914-80fb-4c579fe8b200

Paddy Oliver leads the team at AML Experts. Paddy has extensive experience as a lawyer and compliance management consultant. Importantly for you, he is an experienced Independent Reviewer and Auditor. That means AML Experts is your one-stop-shop for AML Act and AUSTRAC compliance. Paddy can be contacted here.

Recent AML Insights

Browse our blog for the latest opinion and resources for business leaders.

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Proliferation Financing & The Exception

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Proliferation Financing & The Exception A quick look at Section 26F(11) – An Exception, or is it? Section 26F(11) states: Exception 26F (11) Despite subsection (1) (AML/CTF Policies), a reporting entity is not required to develop or maintain policies, procedures, systems and controls that specifically deal with the risk of […]

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – No Statutory Review

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – No Statutory Review “Modernisation & Simplification” (cough). Due to the lack of an exposure draft of the AML/CTF Amendment Bill, 2024, which would have allowed proper scrutiny, the proverbial dogs in the street know that the AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 has many flaws. Nothwithstanding what the Government says, the Act […]

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Proliferation Financing

AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024 – Proliferation Financing What do you think it means? If you were assessing your organisation’s reasonable proliferation financing risk, how would you define proliferation financing? Be warned! The definition of proliferation financing contained in the Australian AML/CTF Amendment Bill is a whole lot broader than what you might think. It is […]
Scroll to Top